Reading Time: 3 minutes

According to the transportation analytics company INRIX, Boston is the most congested city in the USA for the second consecutive year. The city’s high population density, underfunded transit networks, and private car ownership increase are cited as the reasons for the overwhelming congestion.

The study also revealed that Boston drivers lose 2,205 dollars annually, being stuck in traffic, costing the Boston economy a whopping 4.1 billion dollars. Read more about why Boston is the most congested city in the USA.

State of Affairs

As one of the oldest American cities, Boston’s transit network comprises of old, thin roads unfit to handle the modern-day traffic. In addition to this, the city’s growing population and lack of coordinated planning are deemed significant contributors to the congestion woes.

Worst of all, the city’s public transits suffer from poor infrastructure, frequent delays, and breakdowns – leading to rising operation costs and perpetual fare hikes, thus increasing reliance on cabs and cars for faster commutes. Moreover, parking facilities in the city are plentiful and inexpensive, so much so that supply exceeds demand, indirectly encouraging car ownership.

Furthermore, Boston witnessed an exponential growth (7.3 million every year) in the numbers of app-based cabs circuiting the city space, often disrupting the traffic flow. And to make matters worse, the city saw an influx of delivery vehicles violating curb space, blocking passenger lanes, and ignoring parking rules.

Finally, the rise in super-commuters – those commuters who travel at least 90 minutes to and from the workplace – has increased traffic congestion in Boston. Perpetually high housing costs have forced the residents to rent or own affordable houses farther from their workplaces, and often in areas devoid of public transit networks leading to longer city commutes.

Read: 7 Innovative Ideas to Reduce Traffic Congestion with Smart City Tech

The Tipping Point

In 2019, the Boston administration conducted a research to study the city’s ongoing mobility crisis and found that the state had reached a ‘tipping point’; several travel routes turned unreliable as the roadways experienced ‘peak hours’ stretching up to the entire day.

According to the report, congestion on Boston’s roadways went from bad to worse, straining access to workplaces with the surge in private car ownership –increasing carbon emissions and accident rates.

The report also recommended prospective measures to resolve the city’s congestion problems, including the creation of infrastructure for shared mobility, boosting remote working, active management of road operations, increasing public transit ridership, producing affordable housing near public transits, etc.

City’s Response to Congestion

In a move to prioritize public transit and alternative mobility options over traditional driving, a 4.7 billion dollars project – “Go Boston 2030” action plan was initiated by the Boston administration. Among other reforms, the plan includes expanding the city’s bike-share system as well.

Boston is also piloting a citywide network of self-driving, autonomous vehicles (AVs) to curb the traffic woes. The plan is projected to significantly lower the use of private cars in the outer neighborhoods of Boston.

Transportation advocacy groups had advised congestion pricing i.e., charging a premium fee to resolve the congestion matter. However, the state officials opposed those suggestions and instead, pushed for enhanced MBTA (the agency responsible for operating Boston’s public transits) funding and raising the fees for cab companies like Uber and Lyft.

As an alternative to congestion pricing, the city administration introduced a managed lane setup wherein drivers are provided with two options –:either choosing a separate tolled lane or remaining on the free multi-lane highway.

The impact of congestion on Boston’s local economy has been alarming; several measures ranging from alternative modes of transportation to curb management have been proposed to mitigate the negative impact. However, the city still needs better mobility planning to upend the public sentiment about vehicle-sharing, public transits, and car ownership if the administration does not implement congestion pricing.